6
Victorious women.
As
You Like It
and
Twelfth
Night
Troilus
and Cressida seems to
express a darkly despondent view of love and life. Is that
typical of Shakespeare?
No, not really. The average theatre-goer is left with the
impression of an author deeply in love with our emotions.
Among the most charming representatives for love are two
characters, one from Twelfth
Night and the
other from As
You Like It.
Characteristically both have their love stories described
as a detour.
In Romeo
and Juliet there is
a single angle of observation throughout. We experience two
lovers through their own feelings, words and actions — from
inside, so to speak. Both feel emotion, butt against their
surroundings, and go under. They are undisguised and free
from calculation. In the sorely tried Verona the result is
tragic. The background to the tragedy is a certain
innocence in the characters. They underestimate the latent
dangers from within themselves and from others.
Where such menaces threaten, one must change course. For
love to succeed it must protect itself. But if so, we must
modify some of our most basic assumptions. Our simplest
beginning is a naive proximity. He who would survive must
instead acquire a distance, both to his chosen one and to
himself. The best way of achieving distance is to smile.
This opens up other perspectives than we had before.
Furthermore, a successful romance cannot very well be felt
as tragic. To the contrary, a felicitous outcome will tend
to throw an almost a comic light on such dangers as might
otherwise have been felt to be ominous. A life that
surmounts its difficulties becomes cheerful.
The smile as a way of gaining the perspective of distance
and the smile as a result of a successful enterprise are
two reasons why Shakespeare's most undisturbed love stories
take the shape of comedies.
What
happens in disguise?
One such happy conclusion we witness through Rosalind
in As
You Like It.
Structurally Shakespeare's great comedy has a certain
affinity to A
Midsummer Night's Dream. Once
again five complicated stories are intertwined. At the top
of the social ladder we meet Duke Frederick, who has
usurped power from his elder brother. On the next step down
we have the aristocratic brothers Oliver and Orlando,
together with the daughters of the two dukes, Rosalind and
Celia. Rosalind is banished by Celia's father, and Celia
flees with her. The two young groups merge through Orlando
and Rosalind falling in love, and Oliver and Celia
likewise. Finally there are two subordinate couples, the
jester Touchstone and the country girl Audrey, and the
almost mythical shepherds Silvius and Phoebe.
One of the differences from A
Midsummer Night's Dream is the
fact that all trace of magic has been removed. The
characters in As
You Like It still
experience all those reversals that form part of a fully
developed emotional life, but the author has set himself
the task of showing people in rapid development away from
volatility towards permanent ties. The solutions are
emphasised through individual stories constructed so as to
throw light on one another. The differences are made clear
through witty caricatures.
The third act contains several such constellations. The
love-sick Orlando hangs his poems on the trees. Right
afterwards we encounter Touchstone, a pupil of Montaigne,
who preaches that all human evaluations are shallow and
hence ephemeral. When the thrilled Rosalind reads out
Orlando's amorous outpourings, the fool produces his
effects by aping her in a perfectly ridiculous way.
Next Touchstone tries to seduce Audrey, but now it is the
cynic who is brought up short against the peasant girl's
down-to-earth demand for honesty “in deed and word” as
against poetical pretence. The third example is Phoebe's
merciless rejection of Silvius, who must go on suffering
until the socially pretentious shepherdess is put in her
place by aristocratic Rosalind, dressed up as a boy.
The climax is the episodes in which Rosalind, in male garb,
sets out to try her Orlando. Here the heroine's distance
from Romeo and Juliet is made perfectly clear.
Rosalind has disguised herself, as a man at that. This
change necessitates hiding her sentiments, at least to
start with. Instead of living out her emotions she makes
use of the disguise to subject her friend to very useful
tests. She then discovers that the relaxed Orlando is
lacking in all of those romantic characteristics which we
ordinarily require from the committed lover. On the
contrary, her sweetheart is not on time for their dates,
and though he professes to love Rosalind he has rather
vague ideas about her as a person. He actually lets her
down in favour of his handsome new ‘male’ friend!
All this would have been enough to create the most tragic
misgivings in Romeo, Troilus or Silvius. Rosalind instead
takes the opportunity to put across several unsentimental
points of view about our emotional life. Like Cervantes she
sees the state of being in love as “merely a madness”. Such
a disturbance — she tells Orlando — she was once able to
cure in an almost frightening manner. Rosalind, in her male
character of Ganymede, instructed her friend to make
believe that Ganymede was now his ideal. When the friend
tried to make love on this basis, she showed him how empty
the emotions of such an infatuation really were. The comedy
went on until her friend tired of his disturbed condition
and entered a monastery! — If Orlando is willing to take
part in a similar game, she will quickly cure him in just
the same way.
The result is an equivocal play in which Orlando pretends
to worship his beloved Rosalind, who instead acts the witty
Ganymede for fun.
We also note the attitude displayed by the heroine
generally, keeping a firm distance to her own feelings
while investigating Orlando's. By this means both of them
learn to forestall some of the difficulties which might
otherwise have been unsurmountable.
In Rosalind the play shows us a character totally different
from the romantic Romeo, one who actually seems related to
Romeo's Rosaline, who, from what we hear of her, has a firm
grip on reality. Our Rosalind is no less serious and
committed in her feelings than Romeo was; we are given
numerous proofs that she is really in love with her
Orlando. But in their basic attitudes Romeo and Rosalind
are miles apart.
Romeo is at one with every reversal in his unruly mind even
to the point of suicide. Rosalind dares to make fun of her
own feelings and takes the liberty of misrepresenting them
to her sweetheart. These methods prove to be effective
safe-guards against such obstacles as those that brought
about the destruction of the Verona lovers. Through the
game in the forest of Arden Rosalind manages
to
create a promising beginning.
The author's teaching is amplified through the cruel Phoebe
and the down-to-earth Audrey. Both characters serve to make
the state of affairs incontestably clear.
The audience might easily interpret Audrey's rejection of
Touchstone's effusions as expressive of bucolic
artlessness. But we should keep in mind that the demands of
the peasant girl are shared by Rosalind; both regard an
infatuation drunk on the moment as a dangerous disturbance.
Some readers are likely to object that Rosalind's way of
playing with her feelings is unwomanly and at odds with the
nature of love. We may counter by pointing out that the
heroine is above all showing us a useful tool of combat
related to the investigation of romantic love which
Shakespeare pursues in the plays considered already. Romeo,
Cressida, and the spellbound lovers in A
Midsummer Night's Dream, were
all just as changeable in their emotions as Orlando. If
such inconstancy is to meet its match, Rosalind has to take
drastic measures. Faced with the volatile male the woman's
response in As
You Like It is to
start a new game of her own in which she behaves similarly,
but with her changes and reversals the result of conscious
deliberation.
So Rosalind's cheerful testing is an example of the
tentative flirt of falling in love, but it is also a
necessary means of exploring those uncertainties which must
be faced when two people start to approach each other in
earnest.
Viola
Rosalind's disguise leads further than just to comic
entertainment. It is no mere flirtation when the heroine
claims to be Ganymede — the handsome youth kidnapped by
Zeus to be a cup-bearer to the gods. She has disguised
herself out of necessity, since she is banished and must
survive under difficult conditions. To appear openly as a
beautiful girl would be as dangerous as to tempt with
riches without having any defence. Appearing in male garb
is her sensible protection. The same is the case with Viola
in Twelfth
Night.
This play follows just after As
You Like It and is
almost the last of Shakespeare's great comedies, just
before his long series of tragedies. All's
Well that Ends Well, which
follows shortly after Twelfth
Night, is a
comedy which shows us the author from his most reflective
side. It is therefore tempting to believe that the two
humorous disguise-plays, too, may in reality be more
serious than appears at first glance.
A main characteristic of Twelfth
Night is that
techniques from As
You Like It are
repeated to even greater effect, with a liberal use of
classical Shakespearean confusion. Viola dresses as a man
and calls herself Cesario. Like Rosalind she disguises
herself out of prudence, being in some danger after a
ship-wreck. Again the dressing up is a source of witty
episodes, especially when timid little ‘Cesario’ is
mistaken for Viola's brother, the dangerous Sebastian.
The socially elevated pair of lovers is Duke Orsino and
Countess Olivia. The duke loves violently, and continually
and deliberately feeds his own passion, since Olivia
refuses to have anything to do with him. He on his side
keeps assuring her of his love, meanwhile becoming more and
more taken with the handsome Cesario. Later the duke
accepts his feelings for Viola on the spot, in spite of his
long courtship of Olivia and his passion for Cesario.
The parodic version of this high-faluting emotional life is
introduced in the guise of the two low-comedy lovers Sir
Andrew Aguecheek and Olivia's steward Malvolio. Each allows
himself to be persuaded that Olivia loves him and
interprets her acid rejection just as a proof of natural
modesty. Both indulge in the most improbable wishful
thinking, conceitedly sure that their ridiculous behaviour
will secure the favours of the fastidious lady of the house
for them. She, on the other hand, is appalled at the
pretensions of her steward, but her observations do not
prevent her from making equally unwelcome advances to the
faithful Cesario, trying to secure him by way of money,
rings and gifts.
Such comic interludes are even more clearly worked out than
in As
You Like It, in
that some episodes are organised almost as a performance at
the theatre. The instrument is Olivia's cunning waiting
woman Maria, displaying Malvolio's mistakes as a play
within the play, the message being hammered in through
lines like “Contemplation makes a rare turkeycock of him —
how he jets under his advanced plumes!”; and “... now he's
deeply in. Look how imagination blows him.”
Another means of strengthening the message is discerned in
the character of Viola. Our first pointer lies in the name
Cesario. Further, the heroine is no teenage girl starting
out with a hopeless love. She is a young woman who wants to
live alone in order to mourn her dead brother. She falls in
love with the duke during her continued efforts to help
him. Still, she is ‘poetic’ and delivers Orsino's message
to Olivia in euphonic language reminiscent of Romeo's.
There is obviously good reason why the bored Olivia takes
this strange Cesario to be an actor.
Viola has undertaken to help the duke. She is an obedient
tool for him and continues her efforts on his behalf
faithfully, even after falling in love with him herself.
Large parts of her contribution to everybody's welfare
parallel that of, for instance, characters like the
servants Figaro and Susannah in Beaumarchais'
The
Barber of Seville and
The
Marriage of Figaro or, in
Scandinavian literature, of the crafty maids of Holberg's
comedies. The difference is that Shakespeare's Viola
belongs to the upper classes. Therefore there is no
disparity of rank, and in the end she marries her duke.
The development is therefore the opposite of that between
Cleopatra and Antony. The Egyptian queen fell in love with
her Roman war hero because of his male attributes such as
power, strength and prowess, qualities which she
nevertheless immediately destroyed. Viola becomes fond of
her duke for the opposite reason; she comes to love him
when he himself is powerless to bring about the union with
Olivia. The energetic Cesario falls in love with her weak
duke for something like the reason why men take a fancy to
young, frail women.
Roles
and results
The comedies lead to an interchange of roles. The men
portrayed in times of peace are much weaker than the
warriors we shall encounter in Shakespeare's historical
plays. An underlying weakness may perhaps be one of the
reasons why many men develop such power-lust in the areas
at their disposal? On the other hand, the women are strong,
so that we have a cancelling out of the opposition between
‘manly’ and ‘womanly’ in the most basic and simple sense of
these two unclear words.
Such balanced relationships bring about those
cases where love is made to last. The
constellation of sexual roles with weakness and strength
throws light on important parts of modern drama. Such
themes as George Bernard Shaw's feminine ‘life force’ make
clear a superior capacity on the part of women which
Shakespeare has already carefully explored.